| 
     Change Your Life!  | 
    
     Non-inflationary
    growth: Bangladesh’s prime goal  | 
  
| 
       News  | 
    
       July 3, 2000 
 Dhaka
      (UNB)- Government borrowing from banks so far has not had any negative
      impact on inflation and liquidity to disturb macroeconomic management, the
      Finance Minister said yesterday dismissing opposition contentions.   He
      claimed the record of financial management is reasonable compared to the
      past regime in all respects.    Prices
      of essentials are steadied and point-to-point inflation was 2.7 in May,
      and surplus liquidity in banks as of June 14 was Tk 3313.29 crore, Shah
      AMS Kibria told a post-budget press conference at his ministry yesterday
      (Sunday).    “Non-inflationary
      growth is our prime goal and we’ll not deviate from it,” he said.
      Liquidity in commercial banks also remains at a desirable level to meet
      loan demands from private sector.    Bangladesh
      Bank governor Dr Mohammad Farashuddin, National Board of Revenue (NBR)
      chairman Abdul Muyeed Chowdhury and Finance Secretary Dr Akbar Ali Khan
      were also present.   Kibria’s
      explanation came in response to some common concerns that government
      borrowing might generate inflationary pressures and crowd out private
      sector from necessary bank finances for industries.   Apparently
      rebutting his predecessor’s rancorous remarks on the fiscal measures in
      the new budget, 
      the minister criticised what he called ‘making borrowing a
      political issue’ and argued borrowing from banks is nothing new.    Whenever
      government needs, it borrows from bank as government’s income and
      expenditure do not maintain same balance round the year, he told newsmen,
      urging the critics to see borrowing in its total perspective and inviting
      ‘intellectual debate’ on economic issues.   He
      however claimed present government’s borrowing from banks is reasonable
      compared to the past regime in all respects considering its ratio with
      total deposit, budget and GDP.   Citing
      Bangladesh Bank figures, Kibria said borrowings from Bangladesh Bank,
      which is more risky from inflation point of view, came down from the
      height it reached during Siafur Rahman’s period.   The
      government borrowed Tk 1782.8 crore from Bangladesh Bank in 1995-96 fiscal
      year which came down to 868 crore in 1999-2000 fiscal year.    Borrowing
      from banking system was 1.2 per cent of GDP, 7.8 per cent of total deposit
      and 9.2 per cent of total budget in ‘91-92, which came down to 1.1 per
      cent, 2.6 per cent and 7.7 per cent, according to figures complied by the
      central bank.   Kibria
      compared criticism of borrowing, when it rose sometime in the middle of
      the just-concluded fiscal year for obvious reasons, with that of an
      ‘artificial liquidity’ crisis three years back.   Describing
      the loan flow as satisfactory, the economic pointsman of Awami League
      government informed total lending in July-March period of 1999-2000
      amounted to Tk 8508 crore and was expected to exceed Tk 10,000 crore by
      the yearend.   Total
      loan figured Tk 9235 crore in 1998-99, including 1330.10 crore in term
      lending and Tk 7905.49 crore as working capital.   The
      Finance Minister referred to the budgetary measures, including duty
      reduction on imported raw materials and machinery, creating Equity
      Development Fund and reducing interest rate to encourage industrial
      investment.   Responding
      to criticism often made by opposition camp against the present government
      for opening Bangladesh market to foreign goods, he said the previous
      government drastically reduced tariffs and offered special facilities for
      some Indian goods.    “This
      was how they opened our market for India by offering discriminatory
      tariffs.”   Replying
      to a question, Kibria said the government is making all-out efforts to
      accelerate utilisation of foreign aid. Bureaucracy sometimes is blamed for
      delaying project implementation, he said, but donors’ procedures
      sometimes are no less responsible for such delays. 
  |